login or register

fishnet forumsFAQ | Rules | Search
Qld labor party
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next  
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Fishnet Forum Index -> Site Feedback & General Topics
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
frozenpod


Joined: 16 Mar 2011
Posts: 1738
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 10:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Math I saw was roughly 6k per person to keep the plants running ie people employed for another 10k years.

They will pay a shit load more tax than 6k over 10 years so it looks like a win win. But the Austrlian automotive industry is at end of life, putting more money into it seems like a waste as it will not be sustainable long term.

Would we be better off investing the same amount of money into a new industry that if successful would be sustainable for 50 years and generate more revenue and employe more people in the long run. I think we would.
Back to top
View users profile Send private message
DougGrant


Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 15563
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 11:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Will the executives at Holden Australia be taking a pay cut until the company returns to profitability?

Will Holden re-pay these taxpayer grants?

Will the Federal government claim a share of ownership as a result of this injection of cash?

Will additional injections of cash be granted next year?!!!



Sorry to say for the staff they employ, but subsidising a dying industry with taxpayer BILLIONS to produce cars nobody wants to buy does NOT make us the clever country.






Anyhooooo back to QLD... where its beautiful one day....

...and so eager to ditch their Premier that theyre prpepared to elect a bloke who wasnt even in the parliament into the top job... the next.

Im guessing Jools wont be visiting the Sunshine State for a looooooong time.

laughing-fish.gif
_________________
How's the serenity....
Back to top
View users profile Send private message
thrillseeker


Joined: 16 Mar 2007
Posts: 1336
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 12:40 pm    Post subject: Re: Reply with quote

DougGrant wrote:
Will the executives at Holden Australia be taking a pay cut until the company returns to profitability?

Will Holden re-pay these taxpayer grants?

Will the Federal government claim a share of ownership as a result of this injection of cash?

Will additional injections of cash be granted next year?!!!



Sorry to say for the staff they employ, but subsidising a dying industry with taxpayer BILLIONS to produce cars nobody wants to buy does NOT make us the clever country.




Anyhooooo back to QLD... where its beautiful one day....

...and so eager to ditch their Premier that theyre prpepared to elect a bloke who wasnt even in the parliament into the top job... the next.

Im guessing Jools wont be visiting the Sunshine State for a looooooong time.

laughing-fish.gif


All good points, but, this country has already lost so much of its manufacturing base and ability to manufacture basic products ie. Stainless steel, what should be allowed to go next?
From what Onesteel and Bluescope used to produce, and what's happening in their companies, I wouldn't be surprised if they close all Aus. manufacturing plants and just import. That's our major steel industry gone overseas.
There is nothing smart about this country, if everything manufactured or value added, eventually has to come from overseas.
Booming exports of raw materials are fooling some that this country is going well enough for a destructive carbon tax.
An NBN that will offshore IT even better(or worse) than now.
It's a real shame that we have to wait 18 months for a similar result federally.
Back to top
View users profile Send private message
DougGrant


Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 15563
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 1:49 pm    Post subject: Re: Reply with quote

thrillseeker wrote:

All good points, but, this country has already lost so much of its manufacturing base and ability to manufacture basic products ie. Stainless steel, what should be allowed to go next?



This federal govermnet is soooooo eager to cut REAL jobs go.... supposedly to be taken up by "green jobs" that simply dont exist.... and slog taxpayers for the privelidge.

All because Bob tells her to.

HE and his party need as big a brick batting as the ALP do.
_________________
How's the serenity....
Back to top
View users profile Send private message
thrillseeker


Joined: 16 Mar 2007
Posts: 1336
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 2:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The greens can be sumed up with this;

Ineptocracy

(in-ep-toc'-ra-cy) - a system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.



Carbon Tax=>
redistribution of wealth from the most successful and efficient producers in our society to slush fund the deliberate waste by the most unsuccessful and inefficient members of our society.

Somebody must know about the second law of thermodynamics and why Carbon Dioxide can't possibly be the cause of atmospheric heating.
Back to top
View users profile Send private message
thrillseeker


Joined: 16 Mar 2007
Posts: 1336
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 3:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm no expert on the subject but I found this debate helpful,

A measured rise in global water vapor percentage actually coincides with the rise in global temperature, a correlation Co2 in history hasn't duplicated, and a lot harder to tax.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/water-vapor-greenhouse-gas.htm
Back to top
View users profile Send private message
JayyyyGee


Joined: 04 Feb 2012
Posts: 2159
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
All good points, but, this country has already lost so much of its manufacturing base and ability to manufacture basic products ie. Stainless steel, what should be allowed to go next?


You can thank the union minded people for that turning this country into a bunch of woose pussers.

Allways demanding that which is not theirs

Aust has become a very non productive country riding on the back of mining & the farmer

So what does idiot gillard do confused-fish.gif

Stops cattle exports & gives the mining industry a nice new tax

A good case of Gillardnomics
_________________
**************************
Save The Fish, Eat a Pussy Cat
Back to top
View users profile Send private message
JayyyyGee


Joined: 04 Feb 2012
Posts: 2159
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just watching the news on the idiot box

Another instant of corrupt ALP governing this time NSW state politics

I've been bitching for past 4 years in regards to land tax/council rates both of which are determined by land value of a property was very close to taking legal action against the nsw govn

Report on the news said previous ALP govn & valuerer generals office grossly over valued properties in a bid to raise revenue for the govn

Tis something i've been saying for past 4 years when my rates more than doubled overnight costing me a small fortune in the proccess

Eager to see what the current govn investigation will produce
_________________
**************************
Save The Fish, Eat a Pussy Cat
Back to top
View users profile Send private message
Guss


Joined: 02 Aug 2002
Posts: 2107
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 8:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Regarding Holden , it is common for all Governments to subsidise industry with no readily apparent return on investment.

The Victorian Grand Prix is one example. The hope is that indirect benefits will warrant the outlays and they probably do albeit that an actual measure is probably beyond calculation .

Jay , your assertions would not stack up in Victoria. The Valuer General is a State appointment. Municipal rates are based on values determined by Council Valuers. Council strike a Rate by determining what percentage of the land value will used. Valuation multiplied by percentage equals amount to be paid.

The Municipal valuation is used by the State Revenue office to determine State land Tax which is not applicable to you primary place of residence.
_________________
An open mind beats an open tackle box
Back to top
View users profile Send private message
_Gazza_


Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Posts: 2591
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 2:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Don't worry Pale
It's a great era for QLD , kids will probably now have 2 work to pay-2-go to school laughing-fish.gif laughing-fish.gif

p.s. Hows that Lib-Feral Gov't going over the WEST ,looking after RecFishos confused-fish.gif confused-fish.gif

Keep on tugging the middle one mate

http://www.perthnow.com.au/lifestyle/no-fishing-zones-central-to-marine-park-plan/story-e6frg3sl-1226308851195
_________________
"Fishing for Recreation" .....AND a Feed
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Send email
Display posts from previous:   
Fishnet Forum Index -> Site Feedback & General Topics Post new topic   Reply to topic
Page 3 of 10
All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Privacy Policy | Contact Us | Terms of Use2005 Fishnet.com.au